Saturday, 28 January 2012

Lynas Wants to Dump Radioactive Wastes on Island of Malaysia

 A photograph taken by volunteers underwater of an island off Pahang for the publicity use for Himpunan Hijau 109 (the previous Green Rally on Oct 9, 2011) which had attracted at least 5,000 people to reach Kuantan nationwide against Lynas rare earth refinery being built on Malaysia such a  wet land.

 

Fresh protests against Pahang rare earth plant


Lester Kong, Malaysia Correspondent
The Straits Times Singapore
January 28, 2012



KUALA LUMPUR: A plan to dump radioactive waste from a controversial rare earth plant onto an island off Pahang has revived protests against it, just as the Malaysian government is expected to make a decision on the issue as early as next week.

Residents and a coalition of environmental groups are threatening to hold a rally near the site next month, ramping up demands to close down the plant built by Australian company Lynas Corp.

The outcry came after Lynas released waste management plans that showed a proposal to dump radioactive waste from the plant on an uninhabited island off Pahang. It also proposed building a permanent disposal facility on under-utilised or undeveloped land, or disused mining land. The plans were put on public display until this week.

The plant had sparked a huge controversy after it came to public attention last year, and could well become an election issue. Located in the seaside town of Gebeng, the RM2.5 billion (S$1.03 billion) refinery was aimed at capitalising on rising worldwide demand for rare earths, essential materials in many consumer electronics, including laptops and MP3 players.

The company had planned to start production at the refinery, which is 95 per cent completed, in September last year, but this was delayed by public protests. It has repeatedly maintained that the plant is safe.

Lynas has yet to secure an operating licence. International Trade and Industry Minister Mustapa Mohamed has said the Cabinet will decide by the end of this month whether to allow Lynas to start refining rare earths on a small scale, while continuing to undertake research on its potential impact on the environment.

Such a pre-operating licence, which would be valid for two years, would limit production while making the company prove that its waste material meets safety standards.

Atomic Energy Licensing Board director-general Raja Abdul Aziz Raja Adnan declined to confirm when it will make a recommendation for this licence, but stressed that Lynas' waste disposal plans have yet to be approved, and no sites have been identified yet.

'The most important thing is that everything should be done according to national and international standards and best practices. We will not compromise on this,' he said.

Plans for the Lynas plant had evoked memories of Malaysia's last rare earth refinery in Perak in the 1980s, whose radioactive waste was believed to have caused several cases of birth defects and leukaemia, necessitating a major environmental clean-up. It was closed in 1992.

Yesterday, the Green Rally 2.0, a coalition of environmental groups, said it will organise another protest after a rally last year was 'blatantly ignored' by the government.

Resident Jade Lee said her family was considering moving out of Pahang if Lynas goes ahead with its waste disposal plans for the island near the state.

'I know several families here who have relocated and have sold everything they own here,' said the statistician. 'We wanted to live here permanently, but this would dash our plans for the future.'
Copyright 2012 Singapore Press Holdings LimitedAll Rights Reserved
The Straits Times Singapore

Wednesday, 25 January 2012

Something is really wrong with Lynas !

About 300 people flooded the Pahang Secretariat office this morning to support the final submission.

Anti-Lynas protest against licence issuance

Stephanie Sta Maria | January 26, 2012


Stay Tune for more info !

Saturday, 21 January 2012

Saturday, 14 January 2012

The Open Letter to Malaysia Government on Lynas Pre-Opt License Application



Related Media Releases 
1) Kuantan MP : Lynas Speaks As If They Are in Cohort with the Malaysian Authorities
2) Consumer Assoc. of Penang(CAP) & Sahabat Alam Malaysia(SAM) : Malaysia Not Adhering to IAEA Recommendations on Lynas
3) Australian Greens MP call on Lynas to come clean about the Controversial Refinary


      Tan Bun Teet, Chairperson, Save Malaysia Stop Lynas (SMSL)
      Andansuara Rabu, Chairperson, Stop Lynas Coalition (SLC)
      No. 1, LORONG GALING 12,
      JALAN HAJI AHMAD,
      25300 KUANTAN,
      PAHANG DARUL MAKMUR                                                              13 JANUARY 2012

      To:
1.       Y.B. Datuk Seri Panglima Dr. Maximus Johnity Ongkili, Minister of Science, Technology & Innovation (MOSTI)
2.       Y.B. Datuk Seri Mustapa Mohamad, Minister of International Trade and Industry (MITI)
3.       Y.M. Raja Datuk Abdul Aziz Raja Adnan, Director General, Atomic Energy Licensing Board (AELB)
4.       YH. Dato' Haji Zulkifli Bin Haji Yaacob, Yang DiPertua, Kuantan Municipal Council (MPK)
 
CC:
1.       Mr Yukiya Amano, Director General, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
2.       
Y.B. Dato' Sri Douglas Uggah Emabas, Minister of Natural Resources and Environment
3.       
Y.B. Dato' Seri Haji Noh Bin Omar, Minister of Agriculture And Agro-Based Industry
4.       
Y.B. Tan Sri Bernard Giluk Dompok, Minister of Plantation Industries and Commoditie 
5.       Y.B. Dato' Sri Dr. Ng Yen Yen, Minister of Tourism

Re: PUBLIC REVIEW OF THE PRE-OPERATING LICENCE APPLICATION FOR THE LYNAS ADVANCED MATERIAL PLANT

We refer to the radioactive waste management plan (“RWMP”) on display for public viewing in response to an application by Lynas Malaysia Sdn Bhd for a class A license for milling for the LAMP in Gebeng, Pahang.  In view of the complexity of the issues, the risks involved for Malaysia and in the public interest, we hereby request and would appreciate that:
- that a copy of the document is made available to the public to ensure transparency and accountability
- that an extension of time for the review period to be extended for another 4 weeks rather than the existing brief 14 days to review  a plant widely considered to be the world’s largest rare earth refinery.

We would like to draw the attention of your good offices that our Most Honourable Prime Minister Dato Seri Najib Tun Abdul Razak has stated time and again that the safety and health and welfare of the people is of the utmost priority of the people – “Rakyat di dahulukan”.

Government’s commitment to the IAEA Recommendations
We specifically note the Government’s stand in accepting in total the recommendations of the IAEA panel’s report dated 30th. June, 2011 entitled “Radiation Safety Aspects of a Proposed Rare Earths Processing Facility (the Lynas Project)” (“IAEA report”) which includes inter alia that Lynas must submit a long term treatment and storage of its waste products. AELB went further by demanding a demonstration of funding of such remedial work before it starts its operations.

The IAEA report recommended that AELB should also “intensify its activities regarding public information and public involvement. In particular, it should:
·         Develop and make available easily understandable information on radiation safety and on the various steps in the licensing and decision making processes;
·         Inform and involve interested and affected parties of the regulatory requirements…
·         Make available, on a routine basis, all information related to the radiation safety of the proposed rare earths processing facility…and ensure that the public knows how to gain access to this information.”

The Government’s adoption of the IAEA recommendations has been widely reported in the media both in Malaysia and internationally. It has especially been cited by Lynas Corporation in Australia.  Lynas has made many public statements admitting to its failure in community consultation previously and has promised to improve on this aspect of the project as per the IAEA recommendation.

However, we are gravely concerned that the Government has imposed very strict conditions to limit public access to the RWMP. The public and various stakeholders are not allowed to make copies of the RWMP on display nor is the RWMP available in soft or hardcopy for a more thorough and in-depth review by relevant independent experts in the national interests.

The review process is far from being accessible and the review period is too brief for the public to make sense of the detail of the application by Lynas.  We have been informed by officials on duty at the various display centres that the RWMP is only to be made available under strict conditions as required and specified by the Lynas Corporation.

Lynas undermining of Malaysia’s Sovereignty and Internal Affairs
As citizens, we are puzzled, shocked and worried at the same time over the power and influence Lynas Corporation exerts on the Malaysian Government to the extend where a foreign corporation is apparently dictating terms on how Malaysia should conduct its business and govern the nation.  As a nation, we have sovereign rights and power to make sound informed decision in the national interest and in the interest of citizens.

Government’s Duty of Care to Exercise Prudence
The Government has a duty of care to exercise prudence to ensure Malaysia’s reputation and standing is upheld.  In the eye of the IAEA and citizens as well as the international community, the Government must NOT compromise our standards and safeguards for the sake of the overzealous commercial interest of a foreign corporation.

The Lynas Advance Materials Plant (LAMP) is a of a scale Malaysia has never dealt with before and Lynas has not operated any rare earth treatment plant previously.  The US Molycorp project has a zero discharge policy and it is piloting the plant in small stages despite its location in a remote and isolated desert area.  There are many serious concerns with the LAMP design, the shonky construction and its location in an environmentally sensitive area.

If a pre-operating licence is issued, it risks jeopardizing our fishery, agriculture (especially oil palm and bird nest) and tourism industries.  None of those sectors has been considered in Lynas’ preliminary impact assessment.  Any further licensing approval for Lynas in the absence of a clear understanding of its impact will be made at the expense of jeopardizing Malaysia’s own Gross Domestic Products as a large majority of the people in Pahang we are directly and indirectly depending on these sectors of the economy for their survival.
The shonky construction of the LAMP as reported in the New York Times in June 2011 has yet to be assessed and rectified through an independent engineering audit.  Building approval of the plant under this circumstance will risk workers, the surrounding factories, our environment and waterways subject to the hazards of the many highly toxic and corrosive as well as radioactive substances which will be used in the plant.  Of utmost concern is the Kuala Balok community who is at the front line of any water pollution and seafood contamination including the dreaded radioactive substances which are likely to be found in the waste water of Lynas and any leakages from the plant which will be washed into the Balok River and the South China Sea.  

The South China Sea is a shared water with our ASEAN neighbours.  It will be very embarrassing for Malaysia and the diplomatic implication is grave if any contamination is detected by our regional neighbours or any major spills occurred due to our own weak governance and mismanagement of the project.

As citizens and as leaders of citizen groups advocating for the community, we would like to know why has the Government been so prepared to forego its own duty of care and compromise Malaysia’s sovereignty simply to rush through an essential public consultation to facilitate a speedy approval for an application from a foreign company.

Surely Malaysia should be demonstrating strong leadership to comply with our commitment to the IAEA to protect its citizens and the country from the risks and hazards of a foreign venture!

Is the Government not concern that the world is watching Malaysia, and that it is essential to show them that we are a responsible modern state with good governance that prioritises our own national interests – our environment and the vital ecosystem services such as clean water, healthy soil and other natural resources which sustain our economy and our citizens?

Each and every ministry and head of agency addressed in this letter is mandated with responsibilities and duty to protect the country and her citizens.  This duty of care has been entrusted by the people who elected this Government.  Failure to carry out these duty and responsibilities will certainly result in serious electoral back clash in the next election.

Lynas has no capacity to compensate beyond its mine life
In the context of the mining industry in Australia, Lynas Corporation is merely a single-project high risk-taking corporation developed based on rare earth speculation utilizing a strong public relation (PR) machinery to boost its stock to attract investment.  It has neither capacity nor asset beyond the mine life of its Mt Weld operations and the market worth of its rare earth oxides to compensate Malaysia for any eventual contamination and health problems like Mitsubishi did for the fallout from its Asian Rare Earth plant.

Lynas Not Walking the Talk
Lynas Corporation Limited (Lynas) has recently step up its PR exercise publicizing and advertising in our media and especially in our local daily newspapers which statements such as:

“Lynas is proud of its health and safety standards…We share a strong set of values at Lynas around open and honest operations, respecting and contributing to the communities in which we live and work. Lynas would like to ensure the community’s concerns are addressed and their questions answered.”

Being a publicly listed Australian, Lynas is well aware that in Australia, it will have to make its waste management plan and licensing application public and accessible by the authorities there.  We can access all of Lynac’ licensing application and the Australian authorities’ approval documents for its Mt Weld operations online.

The Australian Government went further to fund non-government organisations such as the Conservation Councils and the Environmental Defender Office to provide independent support to the local communities to obtain the services of experts to analyse vital and important technical documents.

How is it possible that Lynas comes out so openly to say that Malaysia’s requirements are more stringent than Australia when they at the same time imposing such restrictive access to such a vital and important document like the RWMP, especially when this document is a long-time coming and have not been routinely made available to the public as recommended by the IAEA and agreed to by both the Malaysian Government and Lynas?

Our Stance and requests
We have attended and viewed the RWMP.  We found many crucial areas of the document that warrant greater scrutiny by independent experts in the public and national interests.  We implore your good offices to uphold the commitment made to the IAEA and to the public to release this document to the public and to make it accessible.

Given the complexity and the many areas of disagreements on the Lynas’ proposed waste disposal method, we hereby request for an extension of time for the public review so that the IAEA recommendation on public consultation can be implemented and complied with by your good offices.

Further, we would like an opportunity to be able to present and discuss specific technical concerns arising from our review and analysis of the application BEFORE the AELB Board make its recommendation to Putrajaya for approval for the pre-operating licence.

We would like to take this opportunity to clarify to the Government that as responsible and concern citizens, we are compelled to and will do everything possible to stop a repeat of the problems and tragedy of Bukit Merah in Gebeng.  All we are seeking is a safe and clean future for Malaysia and for our family.  We trust that as fellow citizens and as parents, you will appreciate our concerns and will act accordingly to protect our interests and not that of a foreign firm.

Thanking you in anticipation

Yours sincerely,

Tan Bun Teet                                                              
Chairperson, Save Malaysia Stop Lynas (SMSL) 

Andansura Rabu
Chairperson, Stop Lynas Coalition (SLC)

Lynas Undermining Malaysia's Sovereignty !

 Press statement of the joint press conference January 13, 2012
by Save Malaysia Stop Lynas (SMSL) and Stop Lynas Coaltion(SLC) on
Lynas Malaysia rare earth refinery application for pre-operation licence

Earlier today, SMSL and SLC alerted the relevant Ministers responsible for MITI, MOSTI and the Head of AELB and MPK in writing of the serious implications of fast tracking the approval process for the LAMP.

“We are totally shocked by the utter impotency and defensive nature of the Government of Malaysia in accepting Lynas’ Radioactive Waste Management Plan (RWMP) under such poor conditions and with such restricted public review process.” Said Mr Tan Bun Teet, Chairperson of SMSL.

If the government issues the pre-operating licence for the Lynas Advanced Materials Plant under its current proposal as set out in the licence application, Malaysia will not be in compliance with the recommendations of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

Mr Tan added, “Malaysia will be embarrassed internationally for pushing ahead with such a shonky project against our national interest and the advice of the IAEA.”

SMSL and SLC has requested the Government to:

- release the RWMP document for the purpose of more in-depth analysis and review in the public interest in light of the serious implication of the project.
- extend the time period of the review for another 4 weeks rather than the existing brief 14 days to review a plant widely considered to be the world’s largest rare earth refinery outside China.

Mr Andansura Rabu, Chariperson of SLC questioned Lynas’ arrogance and dishonesty,

“How can a foreign corporation so blatantly undermined Malaysia’s sovereignty by dictating to our Government to restrict public access to the RWMP?”

“In Australia, Lynas would be required by law to make its licensing application available for public scrutiny and working to a timeline set by the Government.”

Lynas has widely publicised its commitment to improve on its performance in this very important but overlooked aspect of the project especially to its shareholders and investors as well as customers.  It has also heavily advertised and publicized its commitment to safety and health issues.

“Clearly, Lynas is not walking the talk in Malaysia.” Added Mr Rabu.

SMSL and SLC reiterated their stance to the Government that as responsible and concern citizens, both groups are compelled to and will do everything possible to stop a repeat of the problems and tragedy of Bukit Merah in Gebeng.

SMSL and SLC appeal to the respective Ministers and Heads of agencies to protect and prioritise Malaysian interest above Lynas’ ambition and to make decision as leaders entrusted by citizens to act with responsibility and professionalism as fellow citizens and as parents.

“SMSL and SLC further added that all that both groups are seeking is a safe and clean future for Malaysia and for our family.”Concuded Mr Tan and Mr Andansura Rabu.

A copy of the letter is attached for media reference.
http://savemalaysia-stoplynas.blogspot.com/2012/01/open-letter-to-malaysia-government-on.html

Friday, 6 January 2012

Groups Demanded Lynas a 14-Day-Extent for Such Review

Related Media Releases dated 5th Jan 2012 :
1) Kuantan MP : Lynas Speaks As If They Are in Cohort with the Malaysian Authorities
2) Consumer Assoc. of Penang(CAP) & Sahabat Alam Malaysia(SAM) : Lynas TOL Public Feedback Session a Joke
3) Australian Greens MP call on Lynas to come clean about the Controversial Refinary
Press statement of the joint press conference 6th Jan 2012
by Save Malaysia Stop Lynas (SMSL) and Stop Lynas Coaltion(SLC) on
Lynas Malaysia rare earth refinery application for pre-operating licence

Money spent by Lynas Corp for weeks mass advertisement on facebook, twitter, blogs and local mainstream papers rather than going for the real, sincere and clean public consultation

Stop Lynas campaign groups sought greater transparency and vowed to seek a judicial review on the latest claimed public engagement of Lynas Malaysia.  The groups are appalled by the difficulties in gaining access to the Lynas’ pre-operating licence application documents and the ongoing lack of public consultation on the project.

Mr Tan Bun Teet, Chairperson of Safe Malaysia Stop Lynas said,

“The many restrictions and difficulties experienced by the public to gain access to the documents are unacceptable.  It is a total farce especially when Lynas Corporation claimed in its media statement in West Australian on the 3rd Jan 2012 that its application is now undergoing public consultation.”

Better public consultation is one of the eleven recommendations by the International Atomic Energy Agency which was agreed to by the Malaysian Government which sought its advice on the Lynas project.  Specifically, the AELB is to make information readily available to the public and more effectively involved the public in the licensing process.

However, the practice by the AELB and Lynas has proven otherwise. Lynas’ application was written in highly technical English out of reach of most Malaysians especially those who will be most directly affected in the Gebang and Balok areas as well as the rural communities living along the coast nearby.

If Lynas is sincere in consulting the public on the matter concerning the management of disposal of its radioactive waste, the documents should have been presented in Bahasa Malaysia and Chinese. They should also be made readily available to the public be it in hard and soft copies.

The public viewing period for the hardcopy of the application is only for an hour per person for each viewing session for two weeks from 3rd to 17 of January.  This process lacks transparency and has not done anything to improve on the project’s community consultation and involvement.

Mr Andansura Rabu, the Chairperson of the Stop Lynas Coalition and a spokesperson for the local community-based Stoop Lynas group BADAR asked the Government to respect the rights of the community to make informed decision,

“MOSTI should extend the review duration to another 2 weeks at least since we are dealing with the world’s largest rare earth plant here., It is crucial for more people to review such an important application which will have an impact on their life and future.”

“By limiting the number of copies available and to keep the review time so short to understand such complex and bulking documents has already insulted concerned citizens of the greater Kuantan municipality.  I urge the Government not to ridicule the people this way“ added Mr Rabu.

SMSL and SLC hereby call upon Lynas Malaysia to show some respect to the people instead of lavishing its investors’ money in media advertising to promote Lynas rather than really engaging and consulting with community. The most basic thing Lynas could have done was to make the contents of its application in the public domain in accessible languages so that the public can gain access to it more readily.

Should Lynas Malaysia fail to put up the FULL content of these documents in the public domain for easy access, SMSL and SLC shall have no hesitation to file for a judicial review to force it to do so. We believe the management team of Lynas Malaysia will exercise their wisdom to promote goodwill and trust with the local population and be sensitive to the wishes of the stakeholders and to heed the IAEA recommendations!

            (From left) Kuantan MP Fuziah Salleh, SMSL Chairman Tan bun Teet, SLC Chairman Andansura Rabu

Background

Since the 3rd of Jan 2012, AELB has started to display to the public the two documents which Lynas has submitted to them in conjunction with their application for the pre-operations license . This was done with the expressed consent of Lynas Malaysia.

The public are invited to  review; read; criticize ;comment and give suggestions on what was contained in a 250-300- pages thick file ( about 4 inches thick ) from the 3rd Jan to the 17th Jan.2012.between 9am to 4pm excluding Saturdays and Sundays. The documents can only be reviewed  at any one time by only one person  and he or she is allowed into the room to read the documents for 1 hour.

On the first day, only one copy of the documents was made available for review to the public. When the anti-Lynas groups protested on this unreasonable arrangement, 3 copies of the documents were made available at the SUK Pahang starting the following day ; thus increasing the number of people who can review the document to 3 at any one time.

Being concerned citizens and the stakeholders in this controversial issue of  LAMP ,we have voluntarily and  actively participated in this exercise. We were most disappointed that there is such wanton and glaring  lack of care and consideration for the stakeholders in Kuantan!

From the letter by Lynas to AELB, it was revealed that Lynas has provided the latter with 20 copies of the documents . Lynas has also   imposed  various conditions on the public reviewing the documents like  handphones/laptops are prohibited from being carried into the room; persons reviewing cannot make any copies; AELB officer on duty to set a maximum time of review for each person etc…..

Kuantan has a population of 400,000 and they are all stakeholders in this issue. By imposing such  restrictions on  the public it will severely curtail and limit the number of people who can get a chance to review the documents. Imagine that in a single day going by most optimistic calculations, a maximum of  3 persons (at any one time) X 7 ( from 9 am to 4pm) can gain access to the documents. Multiply that by 10 days ( from the 3rd to 17th there are 4 weekends ) only a total of 210 people can get to review the documents.



Divide that by the total population in Kuantan  only 0.06% of the local population ever get the chance to be “CONSULTED”. May we ask is  Lynas Malaysia serious in its effort to consult the public here or is it just meant to be an exercise for a convenient spin to fool their investors in Australia?

Thursday, 5 January 2012

Lynas Speaks As If They Are in Cohort With The Malaysian Authorities

Press Release
MP for Kuantan
5th Jan 2012.

In a statement dated 5th Jan 2012, Lynas announced that the Malaysian authorities will meet to decide on the issuance of Lynas's temporary pre-operating license by the 30th of January.

Lynas  stated that  MITI had indicated: AELB will meet on the 30th January for a decision on the approval for the pre-operating License. Lynas also stated that the decision by AELB is expected to be tabled to a full session of the Malaysian Cabinet for approval.

I can't help but wonder since when was Lynas appointed the spokesperson for the Malaysian authorities. (MITI and MOSTI has thus so far not made any comments on the date when they will decide on the approval of the pre operating license)

Lynas had only just displayed the documents for a mere three days and the public are still having difficulty accessing and going  through the whole document which up till now is not available online as well as no hard copies has been made available, not even for sale. Lynas also had strictly prohibited the documents to be photographed, either using a camera or other device, giving the excuse of protecting trade secret.

I remember not so long ago  when it was the Malaysian authorities happily parroting everything that Lynas has said.  MITI  reproduced input data from Lynas in official MITI documents without first scrutinising and behaving as spokesperson for Lynas.

Now it's the other way round. Now Lynas is making statements on behalf of MITI and the Malaysian government agencies in a situation when the agencies concerned have been silent.

Considering that Lynas's shares has spiralled down, thus Lynas is desperate to indicate to their shareholders that everything is going smoothly re: the licensing procedures. Lynas is only concerned about their profits, without giving any concern to the safety and health of the people in this country. Lynas also does not have a care about what happens to the Malaysian environment, as Lynas will be able to pack and leave after making their profits at the expense of Malaysia.

I would like to remind Lynas, that the stakeholders and the greater public in Kuantan and Malaysia are the ones who will have a very important say in the approval of the license. And it's time Lynas respects that and behave.

Fuziah Salleh
MP for Kuantan, Malaysia.

Tuesday, 3 January 2012

Lynas "Closes Door" for Public Consultation


Anti-Lynas group claims ‘too many restrictions’ to study permit papers

KUALA LUMPUR, Jan 3 — An anti-Lynas group today accused Putrajaya of imposing “too many restrictions” in the public viewing of the rare earth producer’s application permit, saying it was impossible to study the documents under such circumstances.
The Science, Technology and Innovation Ministry (MOSTI) recently announced that Lynas had applied for a temporary operational licence for its controversial refinery in Pahang, with director-general Datuk Madinah Mohamad saying the government will display the Australian mining giant’s local company application documents for public feedback before reaching its decision.
Save Malaysia Stop Lynas (SMSL) chairman Tan Bun Teet however charged that it was impossible for the public to view the pre-operating licence in Kuantan as it turned out to be a limited closed-door session.
He told The Malaysian Insider that only one person was allowed to view the 300-400-page-long document for a maximum of one hour, and that there were other hard or soft copies available for people to “scrutinise.”
“There are too many restrictions for stakeholders. We can view it for 14 days starting January 3, only one person per hour, each day the office is open for seven hours.
“Which means that on average only 98 people will be able to look at the document... how do you go through a 300-page document in one hour? And not be allowed a soft copy for our perusal?” Tan said.
He said MOSTI should provide the public with more than just one copy of the document if it was “sincere” in public consultation over the matter.
“Can MOSTI tell us which one of their officers can study a document that thick within one hour?” he added.
The documents will be on display daily from January 3-17 at the Atomic Energy Licensing Board (AELB) headquarters in Dengkil, Selangor.
They can also be viewed at the Pahang State Secretariat in Kuantan and at the AELB temporary office at the Lynas (M) Sdn Bhd project site in Gebeng as well as at the AELB east coast branch office in Kemaman, Terengganu.
Lynas Corp has already resorted to placing full-page advertisements in mainstream newspapers to defend itself from criticisms over its nearly-completed rare earth refinery.
Through the advertisements, the Australian mining firm addressed several frequent allegations against its operations, including offering its promise that it complies with all Australian, international and Malaysian standards.
The controversial RM1.5 billion plant being built in the prime minister’s home state of Pahang is now said to be more than 85 per cent complete and is expected to power up by early next year.
The rare earth refinery, touted to be the biggest in the world, aims to break China’s near-complete stranglehold of the minerals required to manufacture high-technology products like hybrid cars, smartphones to bombs.
But public protests by local residents and environmental groups over the possible radioactive hazard posed by the plant this year put the brakes on Lynas’ plans.
The outcry prompted a review by a nine-man panel of experts from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), who instructed the Sydney-based company to provide a better long-term waste management plan.
Putrajaya, which imposed tighter environmental safety standards on the proposed plant in June following the high-profile protests, has yet to issue a pre-operating licence for the plant.
The Australian government’s Department of Mines and Petroleum issued a statement on December 16 stating that Lynas Corp’s operations were safe and that it abided by international safety conventions.

Lynas Down